Surprisingly Delicious

On Friday night, I actually got home from work somewhat early. I have been working a lot lately and thus, hadn't done much cooking. For those who know me, I've been getting more and more into cooking, and have been doing a lot of the cooking at home. Anyway, when I got home, I felt like cooking something, but we needed groceries and we had nothing planned. My wife, genius that she is, mentioned we had canned salmon and that she had found a recipe from Paula Deen for Salmon Croquettes using canned salmon.

My first thought was, "Canned salmon? Yuck!" But then I found out it was fried and thought we could give it a try. And I was really glad we did. The salmon croquettes came together really fast and were really good. We had to do some modifications to the recipe because we didn't have green onions. So, to add a little flavor, we mixed lemon pepper into the salmon. It took 3 eggs to get the salmon to bind together, instead of the 1 that the recipe calls for. We also used Panko Bread crumbs, which I really like. After they were done frying, I sprinkled more lemon pepper seasoning on top...it was so good!

And, it's really cheap...1 can of salmon made 8 croquettes. Very good food and very fast, you can't beat that.

More and More Spending

Today, President Obama proposed a $50 Billion dollar spending package to rebuild roads, rail and airports. While I think these types of things are actually good government expenditures, I have to ask, where is the money coming from? And, why do all the Bamster's solutions involve more government spending?

How about keeping the Bush tax cuts in place? How about reducing taxes on business so they can compete in the world today? How about cutting spending and putting money towards paying down the debt? How about some idea that doesn't involve spending money we don't have?

The problem is, I don't think Obama is capable of this. In his world view, more government and thus more government spending, is the solution to all that ails us. He is incapable of even considering other points of view because he is such a liberal socialist ideologue that he has actually come to believe that his ideas are the only good ones. And, frankly, that's kinda sad.

That's all, really a lot of build up for not much of a point. That's how I roll sometimes.

Book Review: "Hunger Games"

"Hunger Games" by Suzanne Collins is the first book I've read on our new Nook. I had been steering clear of the e-readers, but we took the plunge and got one. In fact I'm sure I blogged about wanting to hold an actual book once, but I can't find that blog now. Anyway, the Nook is actually a nice way to read a book, though I did think I read slower...maybe the added "page turning" time.

Ok, so "Hunger Games." This is a science fiction book with a different take on a post apocalyptic United States. In the country of Panem (old United States) the Capitol rules the people with an iron fist. The country is divided up into 12 districts, though prior to some earlier rebellion there were 13. Every year, as a show of the Capitol's power, each district is forced to send 2 of their children, ages 12-18, to compete in the Hunger Games. Think TV's "Survivor" but instead of voting each other off the island, they end up killing each other. When 16 year old Katniss Everdeen's younger sister is selected to compete, Katniss volunteers in her place. Now, she's off to the arena to face 23 other "tributes" from around the district.

I liked "Hunger Games" but I'm not sure I loved it. The concept is an interesting one, and it certainly was an exciting read. What is throwing me off a little is there is slightly more teenage angst going on then I would really like to read about. However, I did like the story enough that I plan to read the other 2 books in the series, "Catching Fire" and "Mockingjay," though I predict some depressing things ahead.

I don't want to give too much away. My wife recommended I read this book, and I do like it...she's really good at picking books for me. I wouldn't recommend "Hunger Games" for anyone under about 16 years old...it's somewhat intense at times.

Affirming What I Already Knew

I've known for a long time that all incumbents need to be voted against in the next several elections...at least 2010, 2012 and 2014. Today, Senator Bernie Sanders affirmed what I knew to be true when he wrote an opinion piece on the Politico, essentially saying that the only thing wrong with Social Security is that people aren't taxed enough.

Really? It's not a problem that very soon there will be 2 workers for every one retiree? It's not a problem that people are living longer than ever, but the retirement age isn't moving to adjust? The fact is, people who will be retiring in the next 10 years get full retirement benefits somewhere between the age of 65-67. Figure that the majority of those people are going to make it to 80 and you have people living off the government for 13-15 years. When Social Security was instituted, most people didn't live much beyond 60, and the Social Security retirement age was 62...it was almost a reward for living long enough. I understand the people who pay into Social Security their whole life want something out of it, but come on, where is it written that you should spend 13+ years retired?

This highlights an obvious problem in Washington. We keep sending the same people back year after year, and these people all have their "sacred cows" that they won't even think about changing. For Senator Sanders, it's Social Security, for others it's Medicare and still others, defense spending. If we are ever going to fix what the Department of Defense is calling our greatest threat to National Security (it's the debt, in case you hadn't guessed), everything needs to be on the table...there can't be any "sacred cows!" That's why this year, I won't be casting a vote for any incumbents at the federal level and only 1 at the state level. We need new ideas, not the same old tired ones. Remember, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

Book Review: "I Am Number Four"

"Nine of us came here. We look like you. We talk like you. We live among you. But we are not you. We can do things you dream of doing. We have powers you dream of having. We are stronger and faster than anything you have ever seen. We are the superheroes you worship in movies and comic books—but we are real.

Our plan was to grow, and train, and become strong, and become one, and fight them. But they found us and started hunting us first. Now all of us are running. Spending our lives in shadows, in places where no one would look, blending in. We have lived among you without you knowing.

But they know.

They caught Number One in Malaysia.
Number Two in England.
And Number Three in Kenya.
They killed them all.

I am Number Four.

I am next."

I can't possibly give you a better preview of this book then the synopsis from Barnes and Noble. "I Am Number Four" by Pittacus Lore is the hardest to put down book that I've read since the 7th book in the Harry Potter series. I started reading on Saturday afternoon, and finished on Sunday night, after 3, two hour reading sessions. Yes, 439 pages in 6 hours...I used to speed read. Thanks to my wife for recommending this book and for allowing me 3, two hour reading sessions this weekend.

"I Am Number Four" is the first in a planned 6 book series by Pittacus Lore. Pittacus Lore is the pseudonym adopted by the writing duo of Jobie Hughes and James Frey. There is also a movie planned for next spring based on this book. The second book in "The Lorien Legacies" series is supposed to be released in the Spring of 2011, and I for one can't wait.

I can't recommend "I Am Number Four" highly enough. It has everything you could want in a book...super powered alien heroes, super powered alien villans, likable characters, action, humor and a love story. They packed so much into one story that I can't wait to see what they can get into 6 books. Hands down, one of the best books I've read in recent memory. There is some strong language, so it's definitely PG-13. I hope you'll give it a shot, I think you'll like it.

Enough Already!

I was watching the news tonight, and an ad ran urging voters to call their congressman and let him or her know what they think of the proposed mosque at ground zero in New York City. I wish this issue would just go away. It's nothing more than a distraction from the real mess we are in. So, in the interest of making it go away, here's my quick take on the issue.

1) The Imam and his followers have every right to build the mosque there. It is private property, so as long as New York City zoning laws allow it, they can build there.

2) The people who are opposed to this have every right to question the wisdom of building a mosque at that location. I have found myself asking, "why that site?" With the public so opposed to this, it seems a little like this Imam and his group are flipping the proverbial bird at the public.

3) The Republicans who are clamoring for the Federal Government to step in and do something are hypocrites. You are either for limited government or you aren't. You can't pick and choose...limited government comes with trade-offs, and this would be one of them.

4) The Democrats who are screaming "religious freedom" are hypocrites. When is the last time any democratic politician came to the aid of a Christian or Jewish group? Most of the time they want to shut Christians up. Democrats don't care one lick about religious freedom, unless it helps them look more "worldly" and accomplishes some dreamed up goal of making radical Muslims like us.

That's it, that's the issue. Now, let New York City figure it out so the rest of us can get back to the important issues, like out of control government spending and grand abuses of power by our Federal government.

Movie Review: The Sorcerer's Apprentice

Life is funny sometimes. I was really excited about "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" earlier this summer, but then it was getting such low ratings on Rotten Tomatoes that I decided to skip it. Then last week, fellow blogger and movie lover Nuke went to see it with his kids and he loved it. So, armed with this new piece of information, my excitement for this play on the Disney classic was renewed, and today, my oldest son and I saw it.

"The Sorcerer's Apprentice" is loosely based on Disney's Fantasia...in fact they even pay homage to the "cleaning scene" in this movie. Nicholas Cage stars as Balthazar Blake, one of 3 apprentices of Merlin. Blake is charged with finding Merlin's successor. In Dave Stutle (Jay Baruchel), Balthazar believes he has found that successor. It's up to Balthazar and Dave to stop the evil Horvath (Alfred Molina) from raising Morgana Le Fay and destroying the world as we know it.

This movie was just about perfect. It was really funny, had some good action and effects, and even worked in a pseudo love story. I've really gone back and forth on whether this is a 4 or 5 star movie, but I finally settled on 4.4ish. It wasn't quite 5 star worthy, but it was really good. It's the rare movie, lately, where I've found Nicholas Cage to be not annoying. I really like Alfred Molina as Horvath, and Jay Baruchel is the perfect nerd turned hero. I think the only reason I didn't go 5 stars with this is I wanted a little more, and then there was that cleaning scene which was just silly.

On the 9 year old front, my son said it's his new favorite movie. At PG, I think it's appropriate for most kids, probably 8 and older. There are a few scary parts that I think would prevent some younger kids from seeing it. Overall though, "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" is a really good movie and one that we will add to our family's DVD collection soon.